| When
my partner Ibu saw the title of my talk today on the sign in front
of the church, she asked me whatever did “Cosmology: Effects
on Empowerment” mean? I replied that I was going to talk
about how what we believe affects how we see others and treat others.
She of course then asked me why I didn’t just say that, and
I didn’t have a good answer for her. So perhaps I ought to
change the title, or add a subtitle “What we believe will
influence how we see each other and how we treat each other.” I
guess this is one of the assumptions of my talk today. I figure
if this is true then I ought to pay some attention to what it is
I believe and notice some of the effects on my own perceptions
and practices.
In 1902 William James published a book entitled The Varieties
of Religious Experience, which was compiled from the Guilford
Lectures he delivered in Edinburgh Scotland in the 1890s. His
audience was academic and scientific, and tended to believe too
little rather than too much, according to James. Although his
ideas are over 100 years old, they are still relevant. He proposed
that we would do well to pay attention to the effects of the
religious experience on the lives of those who practice it. He
speaks of applying the test of common sense to evaluate the actions
and practices of those who profess certain beliefs, and if those
human activities pass the test, then so do the beliefs that inspire
them. If not, then the beliefs also will be discredited. In fact,
he notes that religions do fall out of favor as soon as they
cease to fit the needs of the humans who attempt to apply them
to their lives. He was criticized for applying empirical practices
to the study of religious expression, lest religion itself be
encouraged and make even more of a public nuisance of itself.
I suspect there might be some in this community who could agree,
at least partly to such a criticism.
James writes:
“Religious fermentation is always a symptom
of the intellectual vigor of a society; and it is only when
they forget that they are hypotheses and put on rationalistic
and
authoritative pretensions, that our faiths do harm. The most
interesting and valuable things about a man are his ideals
and over-beliefs.”
I would invite you to apply these tests to what I have to say
today, and do not judge me too harshly as long as I do not cross
the line by “putting on rationalistic and authoritative
pretensions.” And I would ask one more thing of you, and
that is to take what I have to say and put it to the test of
your own discernment. I ask you to take it into your heart, and
notice how it feels in that space. If it speaks to your heart
through a sense of warmth or a feeling that it fits for you,
then I would invite you to consider it further. If not, then
it would be best, I believe, to set it aside without judgment,
for it may speak to another.
I am hoping that my reflections on cosmology and my sharing
of my own spiritual journey will be of some value to you today.
I must admit that to share details of my spiritual journey with
you today is just a bit frightening, due I suppose to my sense
that many of my beliefs will be in the minority in this community.
A couple of months ago, Rev. Charles Stephen delivered a sermon
here entitled “Is Secularism the
Will of God?” In
that sermon he quoted a New York Times article that reported
a recent poll where the majority of respondents in the United
States said they believed in angels. The backdrop of the presentation
of this piece of information was that of the gullibility or irrationality
of such beliefs.
Rev. Stephen stated:
In the secular world responsibility for what happens lies in
human hands. This belief is greatly different from the ancient
belief that the gods are everywhere and cause everything.
Our secular society has gradually broken away from the belief
that
ancient customs were magical or sacred and that the institutions
of this world were ordained by deity. To be secularist is
to see institutions, governments, churches, mosques, temples
as
created by human beings. It is to see ethics and rules as
human creations.
My particular brand of spirituality does the same, and I am
here to share it with you. I do believe in angels. I believe
in fact that all of us are creatures of light, and that we are
the Magicians of the Gameboard of Free Choice. I suppose I ought
to back up a little here and get a bit more into cosmology. I
offer the following as a creation myth. I would also like to
acknowledge that my understandings have been significantly influenced
by the work of Steve Rother.
Imagine that in the beginning there is only the Oneness. We
could if we wish call the oneness God or Goddess, or the Watchmaker,
or Universe. You might imagine the Oneness as a circle with no
beginning and no end.
The Oneness has no ability to view itself so it bends itself
around. Where it meets itself, sparks are set off, that appear
to live outside the Oneness for a finite period of time. But
of course, they are never actually separated from the Oneness
due to the fact that it is a Oneness. However, by having a finite
existence these sparks develop a perspective that allows them
to view the Oneness, which was the whole point of the bending
exercise. This goes on in many varieties and flavors. Each big
spark could be a Big Bang. Little sparks could be various creatures
of light, angels if you will.
At some point, these angels are hanging around and someone comes
up with an idea of creating a special Gameboard, where angels
would enter, but would put on a special veil that makes them
forget who they are. Something like a virtual reality game where
the players get so caught up in the game that they forget that
they are really sitting in a booth somewhere. Or perhaps like
the movie the Matrix, where this whole world is actually a very
sophisticated computer program that we are plugged into without
our knowledge.
Except, in this case, we are actually powerful angels of light,
or Love, sparks of the Oneness, sparks of God. Once we put
on the veil and enter the Gameboard we forget our power; we
forget
that there is no separation between our existence and the existence
of “so called others.” We never in reality leave
the Oneness. What happens, however, is that by putting on the
veil, and taking on these dense physical bodies, we enter a
world of polarity. Not only do we forget who we are and our
inseparateness
from each other and the Oneness, we also enter a time stream
with the arrow pointing in one direction, from the past to
the present to the future. We begin to see things as opposites.
We
begin to see the world and our experience in it as a world
where there is good on one side and evil on another, which
is of course
not actually possible in the Oneness. To quote a more familiar
creation myth, we have eaten of the fruit of the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil. We see up and down, light and dark,
male and female, straight and gay, liberal and conservative,
here and there, right and wrong, helpful and unhelpful, day
and night, religious and secular.
Let’s go back to those angels coming up with the idea
of the Gameboard of Free choice. The angel critics of the idea
ask: “What would be the point of such an experiment?” And
the angel proponents of it reply: “Let’s see if we
could, in spite of the veil, in spite of being caught up into
polarity, let’s see if we could re-member who we are and
connect with each other and love each other. Let’s see
if we could create a world on the other side of the veil like
our world here. Let’s see if we could create heaven on
earth. And the critics would say: “That is preposterous.
We would get so caught up into the many experiences of polarity
that we would probably destroy ourselves.” And the proponents
would say: “So what if we do? It would be a challenge anyway,
and who knows maybe we could succeed. If not, that’s
O.K. too at least we had another adventure.”
And so they (we) decided to try the experiment, and the Gameboard
of Free Choice (planet Earth) was built. We came in and have
been living here ever since, lifetime after lifetime, trying
out this and that, but always keeping to the rules. We had to
put on the veil at birth, and could not take it off until death.
We did find however, that these dense bodies could not contain
all of who we were, so when we were born, we kept part of ourselves
on the other side of the veil, to watch and learn, and this could
be called our Higher Self, or our Guardian Angel. And any of
our friends or spiritual family who did not incarnate at the
same time as we did, could also hang out to watch and learn,
perhaps offering encouragement from time to time with subtle
hints.
Of course there is no morality or ethics on the other side of
the veil, there is only the Oneness, Only Love. From the perspective
of the angels, all choices are honored. We, my friends, here
at this moment, we are the Magicians of the Gameboard of Free
Choice. Charles Stephen rightly praises the secularist for seeing
institutions, governments, churches, mosques, and temples as
created by human beings and for seeing ethics and rules as human
creations. The cosmology I have presented here does the same.
Of course it is we who have created all this. It wasn’t
the gods who did it, except that we are the gods who do it.
I have a difficult time deciding if this cosmology is deist
or theist or something else entirely. In common usage, a deist
believes in a God who started things out and then became disinterested.
A theist on the other hand has some belief in the creator being
active in human affairs. In the cosmology I have described God
remains active because we are all a part of god. However, theism
seems to assume a separation between us creatures and the creator,
which is not present in my cosmology. So I will leave it up to
you to decide, or perhaps it isn’t really that important,
simply another of our many struggles with polarity.
What is left for me to discuss, however, is what effect, if
any, such a cosmology might have on our perceptions of each other
and of the world. I would maintain that all the benefits of an
atheistic secularism, or secular humanism, remain with us. It
is still up to us as humans to create or destroy, to love or
to hate (more exercises in polarity of course). At the same time,
I believe there are benefits that are not evident in secular
humanism. I will outline some of them as follows:
1. When I encounter a fellow human being, I am aware that I
am meeting a fellow angel, a comrade of the universe, another
part of god. Any conflict or difficulty that we might have is
an illusion, unique to this illusion of polarity. Such conflict
can possibly be there as one of those hints to help me to re-member
who I am and to learn to love in spite of the veil. And so why
not engage in this conflict with love in my heart, and hope in
my soul that I might take another step toward the creation of
heaven on Earth?
2. Since I too am a spark of god, I need not waste precious
energy in putting myself down, in wallowing in guilt, or in regretting
mistakes of the past.
3. When Fear enters my field, I need not embrace it unless
I want to, if I can only re-member how incredibly powerful a
creature
I am. Nothing can possibly hurt me since I am fundamentally a
creature of light. I chose to enter this Gameboard of Free Choice
because I wanted to experience everything. This opens up the
possibility of frustration being my delight, and excruciating
pain my joy.
4. Many of us including myself have a difficult time refraining
from making judgments about others, sometimes hurtful petty judgments.
If I can re-member, however, that there can be never be any fundamental
difference between myself and another human being, because we
are all angels of light, and from the perspective of the other
side, there are no judgments, then perhaps I can free myself
from the tyranny of judgment.
5. Living as we do in this world of polarity, it is easy
to get frustrated, or even to step into despair, especially
when
we
see how cruel and heartless we are capable of behaving toward
one another, toward Grand Mother Earth, and toward our fellow
creatures. If I can re-member that whatever cruelty I witness
or hear about, in some lifetime I have done something just
as terrible, then I can perhaps step into compassion not only
for
the victims, but also for the perpetrators. We are in this
project together. We will succeed in creating heaven on earth
together,
or we will not succeed together. Three is no possibility of
some being “saved” and others “condemned.” We
may, if we wish, decide to punish the perpetrators on this
side of the veil, but there is no punishment on the other side,
because
there is no real separation.
6. It is easy to see this world as not having enough. There
is not enough food for all of us humans. There is not enough
time
to get what I need to do, done. There is not enough money to
call a full time minister. There is not enough love in my heart
to love everyone. There is not enough patience in my soul to
parent four children. Etc. Etc. However, if I re-member that
I am a Magician in this Gameboard of Free Choice, then I might
re-member that I can create whatever I want here. I do take
thought and I create emotions. I routinely, without even thinking
about
it, transform life forms such as plants and animals into my
own flesh and blood. I am a powerful magician. I can think a
thing,
and then I manifest it in my life. I can set a goal in my mind,
set it in motion in my life, and create it through interaction
with others. I can take light and create matter. Any limitations
to this process are created by me due to my difficulty in seeing
beyond the polarities and limitations to which I have become
habituated.
At this point, some of you may be thinking, this is wild, perhaps
even interesting, but “Do you really believe all this stuff?” I
want to answer first of all, that it might not matter whether
I do or don’t actually believe this stuff. If I can act
as if it were true, what might happen? Wouldn’t some of
the effects described above be positive developments?
Secondly, because we are living in a field of polarity, I have
to assume that whatever metaphors or stories I can come up with,
will not be exactly accurate. When I described the angels’ argument
about whether to start the experiment, I was, for example, using
polarity thinking. I cannot conceive a universe without it, so
it permeates even my description of the Oneness.
Thirdly, although these beliefs may seem fantastic, I do not
think they are any more fantastic than what physicists and mathematicians
have been coming up with lately. For example, can you believe
that this universe is actually made up of 11 dimensional realties,
but we are only able to perceive four, three of space and one
of time? Or how about the notion that this entire universe is
a three dimensional bane (something like a hologram) set on the
edge of a multi-dimensional reality? Or that all matter is made
up of tiny strings of energy, that it is only the direction and
spin of those strings that distinguish starfish from stars, and
that these strings also spin in other dimensions that we are
unable to perceive? Or that there are an infinity of universes,
each with slightly different natural laws? Or that every time
we make a decision, the universe splits into two with one universe
carrying out one decision and the other, another? All of these
ideas are legitimately proposed theories in physics or mathematics
(although I do not claim to be presenting them accurately or
precisely here).
I would close today with a question as to whether I have crossed
the William James’ line of not putting on rationalistic
and authoritative pretensions. If not, then I would invite you
again to use your own discernment and place these ideas on your
heart to see if they resonate there. If so, then I would invite
you to reflect more on them. If not, then I would invite you
to leave them alone, but without judgment, for although their
flavor is not suitable for your palate, they might be suitable
for others. Thank you for the opportunity to share with you today.
References
James, William The Varieties of Religious Experience, Signet Classic,
Penguin Putnam Inc.: 2003 [Library of Congress 2002033819] The quotation
is from
the
Introduction by Peter J. Gomes, page xvii, , and it is a quote of James from
another source.
Rother, Steve — please see his website at lightworker.com.
|